Evolution Vs. God Movie

44 Comments

  • These people he interviewing are dumb, No mention of Vestigial structures, transitional fossils, or similar embryo development? How about the fact that White people ALL have 2-3% Neanderthal DNA, DNA blacks are completely absent of??? I am a english major and I know these things man…

  • Creationism isn't a theory, it is just an attempt to take potshots at evolution. It offers no physical, step by step explanation of how species develop as evolution does– all they can say is "god done it" and that's not science.

  • What!? What about Lucy she was the first in the monkey family to walk on her back legs they have proof that she exists at least she didn't exist millions of years ago she is the best proof that we evolved and evolution is real and wolves were breeded and breeded with other wolves to get different species of dogs and other animals in the canine family to get different fruits which makes dogs to get the Pitbull they breeded stronger dogs to get the Saint Bernard they had to breed stronger dogs tougher built to get the Husky they had to breed dogs with thicker fur and some dogs they had to breed with different traits just for designer dogs how do you explain how we get different dogs different breeds God does not do that we do that we evolved if you are saying that God does all this stuff for us then you or letting God take credit for every good thing and bad thing you did one last thing how do you explain Santa Claus and explain God or the tooth fairy what's the difference you can't see them

  • "I don't get the point of interviewing non-scientists on the street about a specific scientific topic and then cherry-picking and selectively editing it" He asked four world-renowned PhD evolutionists. No one in the world can refute the observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that there are barriers evolution cannot cross – they can only give reasons to throw out science and instead claim there are NO barriers.

  • Thank You for sharing the Word with us, Merry Christmas, and Godspeed! After watching this, I do not think any of these people will open their heart to a personal relationship with the Lord. While your encounter with them will follow them the rest of their life, they have been ingrained with Satan's false scientific views for to long. Christianity is just to hard for them and they appear to be comfortable living a scientific false lie. Unless they truly repent, they will only reflect about this "seed" you planted when they reside in Hell :O( I pray they accept Jesus Christ!

  • I don't get the point of interviewing non-scientists on the street about a specific scientific topic and then cherry-picking and selectively editing it. What exactly is this supposed to prove? Why not ask people to specifically explain the physics as to why the Sun is so hot? If they can't answer that (and most people can't) this is supposed to be some sort of "evidence" that the scientists are wrong about nuclear fusion at the Sun's core as the source of that energy? This is a really pathetic tactic that someone resorts to only because they don't have any actual tangible, objective, and verifiable evidence in support of their claim.

  • "asked people for specific cases where one kind evolved into another, and didn't receive an answer, because they couldn't come up with one. So what? How is this evidence against evolution?" It's not evidence against evolution – It just shows the observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific fact that there are barriers that evolution cannot cross: For example that no matter how many generations go by (in the lab or in nature): ALL populations of: fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, amphibians remain amphibians, birds remain birds, bacteria remains bacteria, canines remain canines, felines remain felines and many more such barriers. Fish to mankind evolutionists throw out science on the matter to instead give reasons to believe otherwise: that there are NO barriers, then call their reasons to believe "evidence", which is really anti-science.

  • Alright, so you went on the street, asked people for specific cases where one kind evolved into another, and didn't receive an answer, because they couldn't come up with one. So what? How is this evidence against evolution? If you wanted to disprove evolution and show how mighty your God is, why didn't you sit down in front of your computer to do research on the matter. Why didn't you explain why the millions of fossils we have found are all fake? Why didn't you explain why DNA research is all wrong and doesn't prove evolution? Why didn't you show evidence for the existence of your God? That would have made a far, far more convincing argument, so why didn't you do it? Because you can't. You can't actually disprove evolution, you can't prove that your god exists no matter how much research you do, so instead you have to go ask random people for instances where one specie evolved into another. It is clear that you aren't concerned with educating the public, you just want to push your stupid agenda onto others.

  • Evolution is self-refuting … no theory can survive self-refutation … if it's self-refuting then it's false and cannot be true … evolution is self-refuting because you have to say that your mind and your consciousness and your concept of truth and morality came out of hydrogen … and you have no way, if that's true, of knowing that that's what happened …

    There is no known natural law through which matter can give rise to information, neither is any physical process or material phenomenon known that can do this and this is proven by the Laws of Nature pertaining to Scientific Information … that's why it's a Law of Nature and this refutes evolution … this is another reason why evolution self-refuting …

    Life comes from life and there is no scientific evidence whatsoever of life coming from non-life … and this is another reason why evolution is self-refuting …

    All of this irrefutable information and much much more can be found on the CMI website at creation.com

    There's ONLY two(2) possibilities … evolution or creation … since evolution is self-refuting then it's false … it cannot be true … that ONLY leave CREATION …. now that's simple logic

  • "T h e i s m: The belief that a supreme being created a universe with a quadrillion galaxies, each with a quadrillion stars,"
    Why couldn't He?

    "all so that he could author a book to instruct the primates on one particular planet"
    No, human beings, not apes.

    " on how to manage their women,"
    If being commanded to love them and give themselves for their wives is "managing" them.

    "Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;"
    "So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies. He that loveth his wife loveth himself."
    Ephesians 5:25,28
    "Husbands, love your wives, and be not bitter against them."
    Colossians 3:19

    "their slaves, and their livestock."
    No, those who force others to become slaves that you're alluding to were put to death, or in the NT are not saved.

    "Knowing this, that the law is not made for a righteous man, but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and for sinners, for unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, For whoremongers, for them that defile themselves with mankind, for __menstealers,_ for liars, for perjured persons, and if there be any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine;"_
    1 Timothy 1:9-10

    "And he that stealeth a man, and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, he shall surely be put to death."
    Exodus 21:16

    The "slaves" you read about in the Bible are either people that owed money and were forced to become bond-servants to repay, those who sought to become bond-servants to have their needs cared for, or criminals to repay their debt (much like today criminals become slaves).

    But deceivers ignore all this and pretend the Bible defends forced slavery / immoral behavior even after being shown that it actually condemns it as a capital crime.

  • T h e i s m: The belief that a supreme being created a universe with a quadrillion galaxies, each with a quadrillion stars, all so that he could author a book to instruct the primates on one particular planet on how to manage their women, their slaves, and their livestock.

  • A t h e i s m
    The belief that there was nothing and nothing
    happened to nothing and then nothing magically
    exploded for no reason, creating everything and
    then a bunch of everything magically rearranged
    itself for no reason what so ever into self-
    replication bits which then turned into dinosaurs.
    Makes perfect sense

  • Great job, Ray! I'm going to show this video tonight to my teen class at church. It will be great to influence young minds to think for themselves and see the foolishness of evolution. 

     For those reading, there is an atheist woman (Jaclyn Glenn) who claims to refute this video in a 15 minute video of her own. Save your time. She begins with ad hominem attacks, throws one of her own under the bus less than two minutes in, mockingly implies assumptions that no one believes, and fails to refute anything Ray has proven here. That's because she can't.    

    Folks, this video is so powerful because Ray lets people refute evolution in their own words. He shows that many aren't even unified on the process of evolution. Even the evolutionary college professors miserably fail to defend their worldview (yes, it's worldview). 

     Watch this video carefully and actually listen to what every person is saying, and then ask yourself: "Was a strong case for evolution really made by this generation's college students and professors?" If you're honest you'll have to say no. That's because when pressed, the truth comes out: evolution never happened. It has never been observed, and the fossil record is incredibly bare.  There is zero proof of evolution. The evidence clearly and irrefutably points towards Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth."

  • Its pretty Ironic that 1st of you religious people always say "You sinner!" "You did this and that wrong",meanwhile everywhere it says God is such a loving,caring and forgiving thing. So going by that,no matter what we'd do,we always go to heaven,even more so because that Jesus guy ALREADY DIED FOR OUR SINS,so no matter what youd do youd go to heaven,yet you try to bash on Atheists and Agnostics.

    Ps. (If we go by the 10 commandments,then you shall have no other god besides me,is basically every religion out there this sentence is part of it. So technically no matter what religion there is out there,we all go to hell,Some say allah is the right god – Hell,incase the Christians are right,Christians say their god is the right one – Hell according to muslims.
    So yeah I think i stick with Atheism and Evolution because at least that MAKES THE MOST SENSE ("And i go to hell anyway c: like we all do" )

  • Will god love you on judgement day? Everlasting love right? Did god have hands to write the Bible? Just think about that. (Yes I have read the Bible) why do the troubled or the ones that are in trouble or a bad place, fall for Christianity. Yes the Rich and powerful will have a hard time getting into heaven, I understand. So what your belief is, mathematically 90% of humans are going to go to hell because they don’t believe your truth or they will be given a second chance to learn scripture. Why would you want to know scripture in hell or heaven, when those two are in different dimensions, so our laws and beliefs won’t work their. Your God is cruel and makes your life limited, it’s very hard to understand this with delta brainwaves. But I’m sure you pick and choose what you believe, so you might not even believe in the science of brainwaves. By saying all this I still hope all of will enjoy the day with peace and love. It is all inside us.

  • "and then ONE DAY, it just happens that one variant of a species no longer interbreeds with another, AND BANG, you have a new species headed off into evolution in a potentially significant different direction, simply because of environmental factors." Except science shows there are barriers that evolution cannot cross, which is the point they always ignore.

  • "Yeah but I can't see 6,000 years ago when God created earth so he doesn't exist" No, it means the claim is not science, not that it's false. Just like fish to mankind is not science either, which is the point. People are of course free to believe in fish to mankind evolution as long as they realize it's not science..

  • "Then also google "evolution witnessed in real time" and see some of the examples where the entire premise of this stupid video are BLOWN AWAY." The point you're missing: witness the observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific biological fact that there are barriers to evolution that it cannot cross. For example that no matter how many generations go by (in the lab or in nature): ALL populations of: fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, amphibians remain amphibians, birds remain birds, bacteria remains bacteria, canines remain canines, felines remain felines and many more such barriers. Fish to mankind evolutionists throw out science on the matter to instead give reasons to believe otherwise: that there are NO barriers, then call their reasons to believe "evidence", which is really anti-science.

  • Here's the thing over their stupid "one Kind into another Kind" question that keeps coming up. Theists that make the claims that species can't become a different species, despite them accepting "variation".

    The gaping problem they have is that there is no mechanism or defense against why the changes just won't continue piling on, and piling on, and piling on, until, wait for it:

    a new species happens…

    And so we have evolution. And change happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens, and happens,

    and then ONE DAY, it just happens that one variant of a species no longer interbreeds with another, AND BANG, you have a new species headed off into evolution in a potentially significant different direction, simply because of environmental factors.

    It's a beautiful story. And, it's how we all got here. The End.

  • For those few doubting Christians, hoping to find the path to Evolution's truth, ditch this "movie" and go find a real documentary on Evolution. Then also google "evolution witnessed in real time" and see some of the examples where the entire premise of this stupid video are BLOWN AWAY.

    There IS irrefutable evidence supporting Evolution, but TRUST ME, you won't find it on any Christian web site. There's a reason why overwhelmingly those who go to college and study the sciences related to evolution (biology, genetics, anthropology, etc.) see it as undeniable, and trust me, we're locking them in a room under a hot light until they give way…

    As Sculley said "The Truth Is Out There."

  • Great movie…thank you Living Waters! Keep sharing the truth…I was an atheist for 27 years and this type of info would've been helpful to me (although I would've been extremely aggravated at how logical and persuasive your arguments are). As an atheist, I was just plain ignorant of the truth. I cannot believe how I was so duped by my naturalistic teachers and secular education (US public schools). I think the US educators ought to be a shamed of themselves for hindering our education. I came out of their institutions with NO knowledge of the things you shared in your video. Shame on those who claim to be educators but do not educate! Shame shame shame.

    Shame on the National Academy of Sciences…they do more to impose their doctrines through legal judgments than by rational, reasoned arguments. They are blinded, willfully ignorant of the reality and efficacy of intelligent design and special creation. You are exactly right, their hearts are darkened and fools. They have cherished biases (golden cows) that they will defend to the hilt. And defending biases is the LAST thing a good scientist should do! If anyone should be investigating ID/Creationism it should be those that are naturalists. And yet, they close their eyes to it. Heck, these people still believe that radiometric dating is a valid, scientific tool. Completely ignorant of their biases and assumptions.

    Macro-evolution was and still is a atheistic fairy tale…not a shred of observable science involved. Nothing for us to independently test and/or refute. Macro-evolution was stillborn in 1859 by a guy in a time when bloodletting was still practiced. No scientific basis…no knowledge of or consideration of the complexity of a biological organism.

    Modern day evolutionists are willfully ignorant of the current data that refutes their 19th century dogmas. Evolutionists…break free and think for yourselves…your soul is at stake! Jesus said you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free. You are darkened in your heart and it has made you fools, ignorant and lost.

  • "He thinks the world is 6000 years old so his limited brain can't grasp the concept of millions or billions of years." He grasps the belief perfectly – he just points out that it's a belief that they can only give reasons to believe in the fish to mankind evolution, when the topic is instead supposed to be science.

  • "Interviewing a few science students cannot demolish a scientific theory like Evolution." It demolishes the belief that there are no barriers to evolution, not evolution itself. It's observable, repeatable, verifiable scientific biological fact that there are barriers to evolution that it cannot cross. For example that no matter how many generations go by (in the lab or in nature): ALL populations of: fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, amphibians remain amphibians, birds remain birds, bacteria remains bacteria, canines remain canines, felines remain felines and many more such barriers. Fish to mankind evolutionists throw out science on the matter to instead give reasons to believe otherwise: that there are NO barriers, then call their reasons to believe "evidence", which is really anti-science.

  • Ray just doesn't get it. He thinks the world is 6000 years old so his limited brain can't grasp the concept of millions or billions of years. Also, science as we know it has only been around for a few hundred years. There would be no observable change like the one Ray is looking for. His questions are nonsensical. It's also hypocritical for him to be using a video camera that is the product of tons of scientific research using the scientific method to make a video that pisses all over the scientific method and those people that have actually done the work to study these things.
    The entire section on "famous atheists" is ridiculous. The fame of someone doesn't make their argument any more or less intelligent.

  • Dawkins is a religion hater, but this film is no proof of anything as noble as God. Interviewing a few science students cannot demolish a scientific theory like Evolution. Especially when the interviewer is choosing to publish in such a selective manner. I bet those students who were interviewed wish they had the interviews to do over. WOW!

  • "So much creationist cringe. So many straw men. So much ad hominem. So much appeal to authority. So much appeal to emotion." This is all molecules to mankind evolutionists have left when they cannot refute the observable, repeatable, verifiable fact that there are barriers to evolution that it cannot cross. For example that no matter how many generations go by (in the lab or in nature): ALL populations of: fish remain fish, reptiles remain reptiles, amphibians remain amphibians, birds remain birds, bacteria remains bacteria, canines remain canines, felines remain felines and many more such barriers. Fish to mankind evolutionists throw out science on the matter to instead give reasons to believe otherwise: that there are NO barriers, then call their reasons to believe "evidence", which is really anti-science.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

− 1 = 1